"Local Food. Tastes Great. Won't End White Supremacy" ----Raj Patel
"Local Food. Tastes Great. Won't End White Supremacy" ----Raj Patel
Recently, Rohit Kumar, wrote: "How the Local Food Movement is Transforming Race Relations In the USA" and the Huffington Post published it.
Both this article and its publishing in a progressive space like the Huntington Post deeply saddens me and here is why.
(First, I want you to know that I write this comment with love and out of love for myself and my colleagues in the local and all the food movements, and for those who are hungry and malnourished and who have lost and are losing their livelihoods and dignity as small farmers. I know that you and so many people are deeply well intentioned and are working in the local food and other food movements with nothing but the purest and loveliest of intentions. As well, you are my colleagues and my family and I have been working with you for years now, sometimes led, sometimes frustrated, sometimes disappointed, hurt and sometimes horrified by what I have seen, and sometimes inspired and emboldened. I want us to succeed. I want us to build the food, health, and agriculture portion of the better world that we all want. But I am troubled by a lot of what I see in the local and other food movements, so I want to share my concerns with you with the hope that perhaps my little piece of the puzzle can make our work more effective, more just, more fair, more inclusive and ultimately successful in building a better world for all.)
"Local Food. Tastes Great. Won't End White Supremacy" ----Raj Patel
Recently, Rohit Kumar, wrote: "How the Local Food Movement is Transforming Race Relations In the USA" and the Huffington Post published it.
Both this article and its publishing in a progressive space like the Huntington Post deeply saddens me and here is why.
(First, I want you to know that I write this comment with love and out of love for myself and my colleagues in the local and all the food movements, and for those who are hungry and malnourished and who have lost and are losing their livelihoods and dignity as small farmers. I know that you and so many people are deeply well intentioned and are working in the local food and other food movements with nothing but the purest and loveliest of intentions. As well, you are my colleagues and my family and I have been working with you for years now, sometimes led, sometimes frustrated, sometimes disappointed, hurt and sometimes horrified by what I have seen, and sometimes inspired and emboldened. I want us to succeed. I want us to build the food, health, and agriculture portion of the better world that we all want. But I am troubled by a lot of what I see in the local and other food movements, so I want to share my concerns with you with the hope that perhaps my little piece of the puzzle can make our work more effective, more just, more fair, more inclusive and ultimately successful in building a better world for all.)
(A world with better food for some is not a distinctly different world in that which we currently live.)
( I want to challenge the food movements to live up to their promise and to, along with myself and others, challenge the status quo to in fact build food and economic systems which do not create hunger, poverty and malnutrition and that create livelihoods with dignity for family farmers, farm and food workers, as well as sustainably, justly and fairly produced, sufficient amounts of healthy , nutritious, culturally appropriate food for all.)
I am a part of the local to global food sovereignty movements. I have been involved a short time, since
about 2006 when I started volunteering at what was then, the Kansas City Center for Urban Agriculture, and
is now Cultivate KC, to work on a small
urban garden or farm to do the manual labor of farm work which as a part time
volunteer was restorative for me.
I went to Cuba and studied urban agriculture and then agroecology for which Cuban is now famous and deservedly so, went back to graduate school at the University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and the Environment and studied with well-known agroecologists (the scientific basis for sustainable agriculture) Drs. Ivette Perfecto and John VanderMeer.
I went to Cuba and studied urban agriculture and then agroecology for which Cuban is now famous and deservedly so, went back to graduate school at the University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and the Environment and studied with well-known agroecologists (the scientific basis for sustainable agriculture) Drs. Ivette Perfecto and John VanderMeer.
I fell completely in
love with agroecology and the food sovereignty movement going on around the
world for a just and sustainable, truly democratic, food system. I worked in coalition with many of the
national food and farm organizations in the country and finally the globe. I worked and work with many local
organizations working on these issues as well.
Rohit, I was naïve; I thought we were all in this together,
but what I found after several years of working in this movement(s) and across
it, was work and a movement which deeply mirrored the racial, class, and gender
segregation of our larger local, national and global societies. I found organizations funded by the very
global, industrialized, corporate food
system they purported to be replacing, unable to discuss what this might mean
for their work. In short, the movements,
local food, food sovereignty, food democracy, sustainable agriculture,
community gardening, from the local to the global levels mirrored our deeply
divided species and was dominated in large part but not wholly by our global,
industrialized, big corporate food
system.
There are the haves and the have nots, the powerful and the elite; the movement is deeply racially segregated, class issues are virtually untouched and little is done to get to the root causes of our failing food and agriculture and world.
Organizations are unwilling to challenge their own oppression much less the oppression in the outside society. 99% of the work is based on charity not change, which in fact perpetuates the system that creates the need for charity, hunger and malnutrition and poor health.
Nonprofits compete among themselves and worse yet with the people they purport to serve for funding. Global movements are male dominated; white women dominate work in the US.
Many Black farmers still have not received compensation for their land having been robbed and live in poverty; Latino and women farmers still struggle for their own; family farmers are a dying breed over all. Only yesterday did I finally find an organization in the food movement which addresses oppression, including racism and all our societal oppressions, within itself as well as in its work, Pesticide Action Network North America.
There are the haves and the have nots, the powerful and the elite; the movement is deeply racially segregated, class issues are virtually untouched and little is done to get to the root causes of our failing food and agriculture and world.
Organizations are unwilling to challenge their own oppression much less the oppression in the outside society. 99% of the work is based on charity not change, which in fact perpetuates the system that creates the need for charity, hunger and malnutrition and poor health.
Nonprofits compete among themselves and worse yet with the people they purport to serve for funding. Global movements are male dominated; white women dominate work in the US.
Many Black farmers still have not received compensation for their land having been robbed and live in poverty; Latino and women farmers still struggle for their own; family farmers are a dying breed over all. Only yesterday did I finally find an organization in the food movement which addresses oppression, including racism and all our societal oppressions, within itself as well as in its work, Pesticide Action Network North America.
While I have had a very different experience with local food
than you; I am delighted that you have had a lovely sharing over food with your
diverse neighbors who have been so segregated in your neighborhood. This is wonderful; I hope more people can
have these lovely experiences of sharing and getting to know each other over
food which I as well am fortunate to enjoy, but Rohit, a lovely sharing over "ethnic foods," does not constitute a race relations
transformation in this country. I fault the Huffington Post for lifting up your "lovely" piece to the status of essentially saying that local food is transforming race relations in the US.
We, you and I, and all our colleagues in the local food
movement and food movements around the world, we want the local food and all
the other food movements to make a racial transformation, we want it to provide healthy an djustly cultivated food for all, we want it to provide
livelihoods with dignity that can send our children to University and provide a
decent life for themselves and their families, and we want it to bring peace on
Earth. One of my colleagues, Geof Lawton of Permaculture Australia said, "Every problem in the world can be solved in a Garden." Even if such a lovely, simplified statement true were ever true, it would not be easy.
But our wanting it to be that way Rohit does not make it so. To make the claim claim that local food is transforming race relations in the USA now, when we have just scratched the surface of transforming our food and agriculture, is just getting us off the hook before we do the hard work of really ending race and other oppressions in our food and agriculture and society.
But our wanting it to be that way Rohit does not make it so. To make the claim claim that local food is transforming race relations in the USA now, when we have just scratched the surface of transforming our food and agriculture, is just getting us off the hook before we do the hard work of really ending race and other oppressions in our food and agriculture and society.
I think what you are experiencing is a little of the local food
movement transforming race relations in
your life. That in and of itself is beautiful and something
to write about, but I think your extrapolation of this experience to
conclude that local food is transforming
race relations in the entire country is naïve and dangerous.
The danger in this my dear colleague is that we don’t want to say we have arrived before we have arrived Rohit, because then we may never do the hard work we need to do to truly arrive, to truly transform race and other oppressive relations in our nation and world.
The danger in this my dear colleague is that we don’t want to say we have arrived before we have arrived Rohit, because then we may never do the hard work we need to do to truly arrive, to truly transform race and other oppressive relations in our nation and world.
For that reason I find your article and the Huffington
Post’s lifting it up deeply troubling and a threat to the real potential of our
work to transform race relations in our country and world—a task we have found
insurmountable thus far. In fact, as you
are probably aware, the nation and the world’s current economic woes are
exacerbating race inequity in our nation and world.
I think part of what I find troubling Rohit, is that we
human beings want simple answers and solutions to the morass, chaos, ugliness
and brutality of our world of which food and agriculture is a fundamental
part—genocide, slavery, malnutrition, disease, epidemics, raping of the land,
plundering of the land, colonizations, land grabbing, pesticides, poisoning,
disease, health epidemics, GMO’s, GE’s, to name a few are some of the horrible
issues we face around food and agriculture.
Who would not want to escape from this into a “garden” or to “local
food?” Geoff Lawton, one of the world’s
premier permaculturalists, whom I have met and talked to, has said, “All the
world’s problems can be solved in a garden.”
We want to believe this. But even
if it were true Rohit; it would not be easy.
Here is the thing my dear Rohit, and others who truly want to build a better
world, we want to believe that local
food can transform race relations, but
to simply believe that it can without
doing more to make it do so; ie.,
without doing the hard, seemingly impossible (and perhaps
impossible) and uncomfortable work of
challenging ourselves and our world and without sacrifice and personal and
professional discomfort , and without taking on and directly confronting the
evil that exists in our world of which food is a critical part, racism and
other evils will continue. We cannot make it so by simply saying it.
Your story is lovely but transformation of race relations
around food and agriculture it is not.
We have the opportunity to truly transform our race relations around
food and agriculture but we as a community and as a species have not yet
stepped up to the hard work of doing this.
The best intentioned ones of us are stuck in a naïve, escapist strategy
which is failing to flourish because we have failed to take on the evil that is
around us, including racism.
Let me share, that I too am naïve. I just returned from six months in East and
Southern Africa where I worked with social movements around food and
agriculture and just human decency and freedom from oppression, from the local
to the global levels. When I returned to
the US, I had a breakdown of sorts from what I had seen and from which I
fled. I am still in denial, and that is
my source of naiveté. I rather deny what
I saw and experienced rather than accept the horror and evil of my world, much
less challenge it. But where will that lead us my dear Rohit? What will the result of our work be if we
don’t face reality and don’t base our work and solutions on that reality?
Here are some things I know about local food movement and
some observations and why I see a movement reinforcing the segregated and race
inequity of our country versus improving them as you have experienced.
I want to start by saying that I do appreciate the local
food movement, but I want everyone to be able to enjoy local food, so our work
has actually only begun. I use organic
local food and I am solidly middle class and single and able to spend about
over $600.00 a month on food (including eating out). One of my colleagues spends about $400 per month for a family of six (2 adults and 4
children) eating conventional food!. I
eat organic, vegan and low fat after having suffered gallbladder disease in
2010. I eat out at our KC, MO local FUD restaurant at least once a week which
is a raw, vegan restaurant using local
produce as well. This past winter I shopped at our local Nature’s Own Health
Food Mart which carries a lot of local food even in the winter, and in the
summers I will shop at our City Market here in Kansas City, MO. Local farmer, Pod Huns, sells local organic
cheap; it doesn’t provide him a living; he and his family are great at it and
generous. He used to be a chemist until
he lost his job; I haven’t talked to him lately, couldn’t find him at the farmers
market this past Saturday, but hope to get the update on him and his family
this summer at the market. (Huns farm
also sells beautiful flowers.) (And lest you point out this apparent
multicultural relationship engendered by food, let me share with you Rohit that
I have always enjoyed and been fortunate in having racial and ethnic diversity
in my social and professional circles.)
So, local food is
expensive! If you are clever, connected and educated, you can get it for less
but it is mostly expensive and only accessible to people like me, solidly
middle class, single or upper class, consequently omitting the predominately
Indigenous, Black, Latino and some groups of Asian folkss who are the poorest folks in our communities and country
and who most need it. Perhaps in this
most important way, local food has failed to do anything different from
conventional food or is food for the elite, reinforcing the already gross
inequity in race and class relations in our country and communities.
Furthermore, according to a recent report by the Center for
Social Inclusion, only 4.6% of farmers markets are in poor inner city
communities populated predominantly by Black and Latino folks, and the folks
most in need of healthy food. According
to the USDA, less than 1%, or about .47% of the US eats local food. Again, it is a tiny elite like me who are
knowledgeable and able to afford and access it.
Local food does not
pay or provide other than poverty livelihoods for local urban folks trying to
make a living through it; as one of my honest colleagues says, it is a good second living; he teaches at a local
well known community college for his good job with benefits. These are not the
livelihoods that will allow families to rise out of poverty, send their children
to college, and leave the poor inner city for a better, safer and healthier
environment with good schools and medical care, free from violence. These livelihoods do not provide health
benefits for these “farmers” or gardeners.
What will happen to them if they are ill and cannot farm or garden? While many white folks involved in the work
may have families whose financial resources can support them; the poor Black and Latino folks who come from
generations of poverty and slavery and other exploitation do not have these
family resources to support them.
Many of the people making a living in the local food
movement are like me and work for nonprofits promoting local food or working on
food and health issues, but are the gardeners and urban farmers themselves
making a living? Could they do this work
without the support of their families?
As far as the gardening movement sweeping our country and
world promoted by well-intentioned nonprofits and others, do we really want to
create a world where poor people have to grow their food,while middle and upper
class people can purchase their food and are free to pursue lucrative and
powerful careers to govern our world and
industry while we are merely the workers in it?
Are we really giving up on a just and equitable society with equal
opportunity for everyone to get an education and better themselves including
healthy food and decent livelihoods by requiring some of our citizens to grow
their food while others can merely purchase their food, leaving them free for
more economical and influential pursuits?
Given the color of poverty in our society and world, will not these
create an apartheid system of power and wealth with race and class as a proxy?
There is a very interesting article about the gardening
movement raising these and other critical concerns at
http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2162&context=etd
called “Looking at Community Gardens through Neoliberal Lenses.” The author, a graduate student at Iowa state,
also point out the class and race differences between those who administer
these community gardens and those who are the recipients of these programs and
raises questions as to their ability to empower participants given this
hierarchy. He also points out that many
of these programs fail after a few years and the gardens are abandoned. Also many of these gardening and urban
farming programs have not managed to own the land on which they reside, a
fundamental injustice in itself with grave racial implications since again most
of the recipients of the gardening programs are poor people of color who do not
own the land on which they are gardening or farming.
Another concern I have about the local food movement is the
safety of the product given urban environmental pollution and the lack of
financial resources to test land and water and what impact this will have on
race relations since most of the people in these areas are poor people of
color. One of my friends who has farmed
or gardened for years nearby recently found out that her land was poisoned by
lead and is having it just now re mediated.
They have eaten the food for years and sold it as well.
Global warming is also challenging the local food
movement as local farmers and gardeners
cannot keep up with water costs or needs; this will impact the poor most who
are being encouraged to rely on gardening for their food and who are
predominately people of color.
I have also observed that local food farmer training
programs are unable to provide training equally to Black and other people of
color as to white folks as well. Most of
these programs are run by white folks and middle class or upper middle class
folks of any race who are unable to
reach across racial and class barriers successfully .
My conclusion is that “local food” is currently an elite movement by a few, feeding those who
can already afford healthy food and perhaps providing a little extra income for
some folks—the importance of which is not to be discounted. I.e., having a
little extra cash. The question is whether it can become a truly inclusive just
and fair movement.
Rohit, what I suggest, instead of prematurely congratulating
ourselves that local food is transforming race relations in the US, is for
those of us who like yourself, myself and so many others working hard in this
field and just don’t know what to do to overcome racism in our food, society
and work; that we take this opportunity to truly challenge the evil in our
society and ourselves (do we doubt any of us (of all races) that we are all
capable of evil?) and do the hard
work to truly overcome the substantial
barriers that exist to racial equity in our food and agriculture movements, our
organizations and ourselves.
Being people of color, subject to racial and ethnic discrimination, does not omit us from this hard work either. We need to do our part as well in truly building a local food movement which takes on the race inequity in our food and agriculture as well as our powerful, global, industrialized corporate food system which is inherently destructive of our health and our environment, racist and creates poverty and hunger.
Being people of color, subject to racial and ethnic discrimination, does not omit us from this hard work either. We need to do our part as well in truly building a local food movement which takes on the race inequity in our food and agriculture as well as our powerful, global, industrialized corporate food system which is inherently destructive of our health and our environment, racist and creates poverty and hunger.
In other words, we
can’t just sit back growing “local food” without taking on the very systems
which have destroyed our once vibrant local food systems and be successful in
creating a movement which does improve race relations in the US as well as end
poverty and hunger.
Exactly.
ReplyDelete